CRIME
& PUNISHMENT
Malcolm Rigg’s memory of “Titch” Schofield caning a class because of their football allegiances caused me to think about “Crime & Punishment” in JCS.
“Titch” caned a lot. Out of the 30 odd classes
I had with him in 1A woodwork, I must have been caned in about 20 of them. Some
were for “misdemeanours” he saw like having a hand in front of a chisel
blade, but others appeared to be at his whim. One week he started the class by
asking the date: “13th, sir” we all said. “Ah 13th
unlucky for some. Line up here”. We did - he caned us all. Another day
happened to be the 26th; so we got two strokes each, as it was
“doubly unlucky.”
“Titch” was also the cause of a number of us being
caned by Mr Hopwood for arguing with the teacher i.e. Mr Schofield. It was like
this: Mr McKenna was off sick; Mr Schofield took his literature class and
decided to do Longfellow’s “Song of Hiawatha”. So far so good. Some time
during the class we had managed to include Pocahontas as well as Hiawatha.
“Titch” calmly states, “Pocahontas and Hiawatha were Indian braves”.
Some of us say, “No Pocahontas was a squaw” – “Titch” is adamant that
“he is a man”. We continue to argue. “Titch” eventually sends about six
of us out of the room to stand outside the headmaster’s office.
Mr Hopwood comes out asks why we are there and then consults Mr
Schofield. Mr Hopwood gives us the cane.
The regular canings by “Titch” and some others meant
some of us became blasé about it. In fact you got called names by some of the
other boys, if you had not been caned for a long time. This was happening to me
when in 4G. Then, one day rushing to a class, as only a teenage boy can, Mr
McKenna behind me “CAVALIER come here”. “Why were you running down the
corridor?” he asked; I stuttered, “So I wont be late for class”. “Well
you will be now – two strokes for breaking school rules”. Out came the cane
from the staff room and two strokes were administered. Mr McKenna was a little
bemused when I walked away with a smile on my face – Dave Laurie and Billy
Rounce had walked by while I was being caned and they would report to the class
– the name calling stopped.
I do not believe that caning harmed me in any way, but it did not make me any better than I was – I still ran down the corridors when I needed to. I was caned twice for smoking, but did not give up until I was 27, which was rather a delayed reaction to the caning!
My father’s reaction to caning was, “You must
have deserved it”. His reaction to an excessive “lines” punishment was to
write to Mr Hopwood and complain. The situation was I was given 100 lines by a
prefect, I cannot remember why. As was usual lines issued by prefects were about
3 or 4 lines long when hand written on foolscap. I did not do them. Prefect
doubles them to 200 lines. I still did not do them. Doubled again to 400 I
decided to do them – Sunday night before they had to be in. Dad sees me doing
them and asks what I was doing. He writes to Mr Hopwood. The gist of the letter
was to say 400 lines was excessive and meaningless, and why had the school not
informed him when I had failed to do the first punishment of 100 lines?
Which brings me to the ultimate punishment the school could have given me – tell my parents.